What defines "discovery obligations" as per the CCP?

The definition of "discovery obligations" under the Code of Criminal Procedure mandates that both parties are required to share information prior to the trial. This concept is fundamental to ensuring fairness in the legal process, as it allows both the prosecution and the defense to be aware of the evidence that will be presented during trial. This sharing of evidence helps to promote transparency, prevent surprises in court, and contribute to the ability of both sides to prepare their cases effectively.

In the context of a trial, discovery typically involves the exchange of documents, witness lists, and other relevant information that could influence the outcome of the case. This framework not only upholds the principle of due process but also helps foster an environment where truth-finding can occur, as both sides can build their arguments based on the same foundational evidence.

The other options reflect misunderstandings of the discovery process. The idea that only the prosecution must share evidence does not align with the principle that both sides have an obligation to disclose relevant materials. The option suggesting that discovery is optional if both parties agree undermines the critical nature of preparing for trial, as certain disclosures are mandatory regardless of agreement. Lastly, the proposition that evidence does not need to be shared if it is unfavorable misrepresents discovery obligations, as the